Greg
animals food and drink
gardening general
language multimedia
opinion photography
politics technology
Greg's diary
November 2018
Translate this page
Select day in November 2018:
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
Select month:
2018 Jan Feb Mar Apr
2018 May Jun Jul Aug
2018 Sep Oct Nov Dec
Today's diary entry
Diary index
About this diary
Previous month
Greg's home page
Greg's photos
Network link stats
Greg's other links
Copyright information
    
Groogle

Thursday, 1 November 2018 Dereel Images for 1 November 2018
Top of page
next day
last day

ARPAnet and the dangers of daylight saving time
Topic: general, opinion Link here

I've recently become aware of a number of people who strongly object to daylight saving time. OK, I'm not a great fan, but there are many other things I'd rather grumble about.

But then, a couple of days ago was the 49th anniversary of the day I wrote my first program. For some reason, people found it more interesting that it was also the day that the first two datagrams were transmitted across the ARPANET.

Or was it? The documentation states that it happened on 29 October 1969, at 22:30. What time zone? US Pacific Time. DST or no DST? Nowadays it would be DST, since the transition is the first Sunday in November. But was it like that at the time? Spent quite a bit of time reading /usr/src/contrib/tzdata/northarmerica and watching my eyes go funny, and came to the conclusion: yes, standard time. In 1969 (and, it seems, until as recently as 2006), DST ended on the last Sunday in October:

# Rule  NAME    FROM    TO      TYPE    IN      ON      AT      SAVE    LETTER/S
Rule    US      1918    1919    -       Mar     lastSun 2:00    1:00    D
Rule    US      1918    1919    -       Oct     lastSun 2:00    0       S
Rule    US      1942    only    -       Feb     9       2:00    1:00    W # War
Rule    US      1945    only    -       Aug     14      23:00u  1:00    P # Peace
Rule    US      1945    only    -       Sep     lastSun 2:00    0       S
Rule    US      1967    2006    -       Oct     lastSun 2:00    0       S
Rule    US      1967    1973    -       Apr     lastSun 2:00    1:00    D
Rule    US      1974    only    -       Jan     6       2:00    1:00    D
Rule    US      1975    only    -       Feb     23      2:00    1:00    D
Rule    US      1976    1986    -       Apr     lastSun 2:00    1:00    D
Rule    US      1987    2006    -       Apr     Sun>=1  2:00    1:00    D
Rule    US      2007    max     -       Mar     Sun>=8  2:00    1:00    D
Rule    US      2007    max     -       Nov     Sun>=1  2:00    0       S

And the last Sunday in October 1969 was 26 October 1969. Some discussion on the TUHS mailing list, where people repeated their dislike of DST. But this message still contained an interesting example of the dangers of getting your DST wrong


Focus stacked macros: the pain
Topic: photography, gardening, opinion Link here

Off down the road again today to take some more photos of the Thelymitra pauciflora. It wasn't easy: it was windier than I had expected, my footstool proved to be so low that it was almost no help:,


This should be Thelymitra-photos-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Thelymitra photos 1          Dimensions:          4608 x 3457, 4808 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Make this image small again Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Thursday, 1 November 2018, thumbnails          All images taken on Thursday, 1 November 2018, small
Diary entry for Thursday, 1 November 2018 Complete exposure details

   
This should be Thelymitra-photos-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Thelymitra photos 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 155 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3457, 3504 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 1 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The barely visible pair of Thelymitra in the middle of the second image show the problem. In addition, I ran into significant technical problems: I really, really want to be able to tell the camera to take a series of images over a focus range, not just a fixed number, which might be too many or too few. And to help that, I need much better support from the camera. “Focus peaking” is an excellent idea, but for some reason it pretty much doesn't work at all when you're close to 1:1 magnification. And then there's this stupid bug in the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II firmware: when the external viewfinder is connected, the camera switches off focus stacking, so I continually had to disconnect it before taking the photos.

Back home with 240 odd photos (about 5 GB), but wasn't able to get any useful results before evening.


CJ's computer problems, next installment
Topic: technology Link here

CJ Ellis along towards evening. He hadn't called or sent email: his entire electronic infrastructure was offline, he said. Aussie Broadband had cancelled his service because he had accidentally replied to a spam message, so his VoIP service didn't work any more either. And his computer continually displayed pornographic images that he couldn't get rid of.

OK, first things first. Contacted Aussie Broadband. No, the service was still intact. OK, fire up the machine. Indeed, as soon as I started chrome, up popped multiple very pornographic images like a Hydra: as soon as you closed on, another popped up in its place. Installed firefox and confirmed that this was some configuration of his chrome. Some time, when I have the time, I suppose I should reinstall that for him. Probably it would make more sense to reinstall the whole system from an image I took a while back.

The other issue: his machine runs Microsoft “Windows” 7. It has 2 GB of memory:


This should be DIMM.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: DIMM          Dimensions:          1072 x 252, 138 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Thursday, 1 November 2018, thumbnails          All images taken on Thursday, 1 November 2018, small
Diary entry for Thursday, 1 November 2018 Complete exposure details

 

And that is clearly too little. The poor little thing is swapping its heart out. Now where did I have a spare DIMM? What kind is it, anyway? Do I really have to count the contacts?


Friday, 2 November 2018 Dereel
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Downloading film list: correction
Topic: technology, opinion Link here

A couple of days ago I discovered that I couldn't download MediathekView's file list using the internal download function: it timed out repeatedly. But using fetch worked fine, so I decided to do that instead.

But things aren't that simple. Today fetch timed out repeatedly for over an hour. So I tried it with the internal downloader. It worked immediately! So whatever the issue is, it's not as simple as bugs in the internal downloader.


More Thelymitras
Topic: photography, gardening, opinion Link here

Spent quite some time trying to process yesterday's Thelymitra flowers, with very limited success:

 
This should be Thelymitra-pauciflora-4-DMap.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Thelymitra pauciflora 4 DMap
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 71 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 2025 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 1 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Thelymitra-pauciflora-7-DMap.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Thelymitra pauciflora 7 DMap
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 66 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 2057 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 1 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That's all I got out of a total of 240 images: only four in total (the other two look very similar), and even those don't bear much looking at.

What went wrong? Mainly the wind, but also getting things in focus. Even the close-up isn't as good as it should be: the tip of the petal at the bottom isn't completely in focus, nor is the back of the flower. In this case, clearly I needed not only a better start focus point, but also more steps. There should really be more help from the camera. And why doesn't focus peaking work at these distances?

On the positive side, I found some more, much more accessible flowers in front of our own property. But it was far too windy—we had winds of up to 33 km/h and gusts of up to 48 km/h. Tomorrow? Then it will be cooler, so the flowers will probably shrivel up and die.


Installing the new cooktops
Topic: general Link here

Now that we have the new gas and induction cooktops, it's time to install them. I had been recommended Mike Simpson (“Mike for odd jobs”, phone 0419 935 147), who proves to do mainly joinery, and definitely no plumbing, electrical or painting work. He charges round $80 just to come out here, but today he was prepared to do it for free—just to take a look, and definitely not to install the cooktops.

He showed up and spent some time investigating. The good news: it's straightforward. The less good news: he can't do it for at least 2 weeks. I was also left wondering whether it would even work the way we planned it, with a single hole for both cooktops. The Bosch cooktop has clips on either side to hold it in place. How can that work if there's nothing to clip to on the one side?


Saturday, 3 November 2018 Dereel Images for 3 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Wildflowers and orchids
Topic: gardening Link here

The weather has changed completely in the last couple of days. On Thursday the temperature reached 32.8° and didn't drop below 20° after 8:00. Today the temperatures ranged from 9° to 18°. And not surprisingly, the Thelymitra pauciflora were no longer flowering. While searching for them, though, I found at least a dozen plants at the north-east corner of our plot of land. Have they all finished flowering? I'll keep my eyes open.

Further south, there are plenty of wildflowers, but how do you catch them in a photo?


This should be Nature-strip-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Nature strip 1          Dimensions:          1132 x 238, 192 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Saturday, 3 November 2018, thumbnails          All images taken on Saturday, 3 November 2018, small
Diary entry for Saturday, 3 November 2018 Complete exposure details

 

It's not until you enlarge it greatly (this is a 52 MP image) that you see what you would see with the naked eye:

 
This should be Nature-strip-1-0-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Nature strip 1 0 detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 675 x 400, 200 kB
Dimensions of original: 1008 x 597, 357 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 3 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Nature-strip-1-1-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Nature strip 1 1 detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 634 x 425, 224 kB
Dimensions of original: 1418 x 951, 804 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 3 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Nature-strip-1-1-detail-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Nature strip 1 1 detail 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 615 x 439, 102 kB
Dimensions of original: 387 x 276, 79 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 3 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The white flowers are Burchardia umbellata (or “Milkmaids”), and the violet flowers are, I think, Thysanotus patersonii, also called Twining Fringe Lily. The problem is that there is no fringe. Could it be something else?


Air fried hash browns
Topic: food and drink, opinion Link here

Rather against my will, Yvonne wanted to serve hash browns with the pepper steaks this evening. How should we prepare them? Another task for the digital air fryer. But how do I arrange them? Put them flat and they'll only get done on one side. But that wasn't an option: the basket was too small. In the end, tried them in different orientations, and all worked. Here before, after, and in the serving dish (Yvonne had tastefully turned the pale side downwards):

 
This should be Hash-browns-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Hash browns 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 608 x 444, 105 kB
Dimensions of original: 5321 x 3888, 3235 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 3 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Hash-browns-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Hash browns 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 602 x 448, 100 kB
Dimensions of original: 5226 x 3888, 3225 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 3 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Hash-browns-3.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Hash browns 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 601 x 449, 101 kB
Dimensions of original: 5206 x 3888, 2683 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 3 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry


The sadness of this world
Topic: animals, opinion Link here

Nikolai, in a typical pose:

 
This should be Nikolai-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Nikolai 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 572 x 472, 172 kB
Dimensions of original: 4711 x 3888, 4841 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 3 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry


Sunday, 4 November 2018 Dereel Images for 4 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Sir Christiane rides again
Topic: photography, animals, opinion Link here

Chris Bahlo has been coming here to go riding for a simple reason: she needs somebody to help her to put on her armour. For me, it was a chance to try out new autofocus settings. Kev Russell on the M43 Tech Talk Facebook group had made a post suggesting the use of “small” focus points on the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II, so I tried that.

This time things were interesting for reasons not related to photography. Chris had mechanical issues with her armour, and Yvonne needed to fix them (https://youtu.be/oWOyaWG1ZqE and https://youtu.be/jM7LN0D6WKo):

 
This should be Chris-1.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Chris 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 458 x 589, 556 kB
Dimensions of original: 798 x 1027, 1347 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 4 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Chris-2.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Chris 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 492 x 549, 535 kB
Dimensions of original: 852 x 951, 1255 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 4 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

She returned again later for more adjustments. The cord is electric fence wiring, though we considered that cable ties probably would have done better:

 
This should be Sir-Christiane-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sir Christiane 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 144 kB
Dimensions of original: 3889 x 5184, 3875 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 4 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Finally she was off, and I had the opportunity to compare my focus tracking:

Nope, I'm still losing focus, though I kept the focus point on the horse throughout the clip. In addition, the exposure compensation is jerky. I haven't seen that before. Could that be due to the M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150 mm f/4.0-5.6 that I used on this occasion?

Also took another failed focus attempt.


Fringe lily? Chocolate lily?
Topic: gardening, photography, opinion Link here

While writing up yesterday's article on the wildflowers, I found a discrepancy between what I considered a Thysanotus patersonii (twining fringe lily) and what I had. On Google image search I found a photo that exactly matched my flowers:

 
This should be Thysanotus-patersonii-6.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Thysanotus patersonii 6
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 106 kB
Dimensions of original: 4032 x 3024, 2080 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 11 October 2014:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Unfortunately, it proved that I had taken it myself, even in exactly the same place. And closer examination shows that the “fringe lily” is called that because of the fringes on the petals, which are missing here.

Further investigation suggested that it might instead be a Dichopogon strictus, for some reason called a “chocolate lily”:

OK, time for some focus stacked images, this time in a more controlled environment than last time. Much work, and once again failure! Firstly, I didn't get enough shots (WHY can't Olympus supply better aids to decide on start and end focus?):

 
This should be Dichopogon-strictus-5-DMap.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Dichopogon strictus 5 DMap
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 64 kB
Dimensions of original: 5189 x 3888, 2198 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 4 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Dichopogon-strictus-6-DMap.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Dichopogon strictus 6 DMap
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 68 kB
Dimensions of original: 5189 x 3888, 2827 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 4 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Apart from that, of course, the photo was taken from the wrong angle, which only occurred to after it was all finished. I really need to spend a lot more time setting up these images.


Buy Britannica!
Topic: language, opinion Link here

A while back I signed up with Encyclopædia Britannica in the hope of getting some interesting suggestions. Instead I got marginally disguised spam. But today's message was the limit:

Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 18:40:47 -0600
From: Britannica <noreply@email.britannica.com>
Subject: Who did Ben Franklin consider deranged?

Interestingly, the content didn't refer to Benjamin Franklin at all. But how should I parse it? Who considered Ben Franklin to be deranged? Good-bye, Britannica.


Monday, 5 November 2018 Dereel Images for 5 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Extracting frames from videos
Topic: multimedia, photography, opinion Link here

Yesterday's video clips contained some interesting individual frames. They were 1080p, so the resultant images would be quite acceptable. But how do I extract them? It's not the first time: I did exactly the same thing two months ago. But how? I forgot to write it down.

While pondering the issue, I received one of these horrible spams from Ashampoo: video optimizer, for a special low price. I've had lots of issues with Ashampoo recently, and I'm seriously considering changing to some other software—if I can find something that's not equally painful. Still, it might be what I'm looking for, at least for today, so I downloaded it.

And once again I ran into a hang entering data. I was offered an extension of the 10 day free trial to 30 days—just enter my customer email address. But once again it hung, and I had to shoot it down. But it didn't want to know: when I tried to restart it, it claimed to be already running, no matter what the Task Manager might say:

 
This should be Ashampoo-Schroedinger.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Ashampoo Schroedinger
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 577 x 468, 80 kB
Dimensions of original: 454 x 368, 11 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 5 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

What's the problem here? I've established that their support department, though well-meaning, doesn't know how to escalate things, but my guess is that this is related to the fact that I access my Microsoft box via remote desktop, and there's some bug that the developers aren't finding out about. But life's too short for that kind of thing, so today I just took screen shots of the frames I wanted. I probably should spend some time investigating video processing software.


DxO PhotoLab 2
Topic: photography, technology, opinion Link here

For a couple of months now I've been investigating various ways to remove the artefacts from this image:

 
This should be Kangaroos-47.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Kangaroos 47
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 204 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 4714 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 14 August 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

On 11 September I tried Inpaint, and on 25 October I tried movavi Photo Editor. Both sort of worked, but they were fiddly: they don't offer any help to recognizing areas that I want to mark.

And now DxO has brought out another release of PhotoLab. What are the features? What are the differences? Is it worth paying $70 for the upgrade? In principle I've been relatively happy with DxO, but documentation is not their forte. Spent some time looking at their videos, which are more geared towards advertising, and it seems that it can do the same things as Inpaint and movavi. Tried it out and discovered one serious issue: one of the functions is assigned to Alt-left button. But that's already used by my window manager. Not DxO's problem, of course, but it's a concern: the first time in over 20 years that I've run into this kind of conflict.

Still, I was able to mark things. How do I then delete them? I still don't know. It's certainly not “intuitive”, and once again I couldn't find the manual. Why don't they have videos showing the details and not just the result? This is exactly the situation where it would be a good idea.


Tomatoes: time to go
Topic: gardening, opinion Link here

Six weeks ago I planted some tomato seedlings into pots to wait for Melbourne Cup Day:

 
This should be Tomato-seedlings-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Tomato seedlings 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 193 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 3686 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 25 September 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Tomato-seedlings-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Tomato seedlings 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 197 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 4257 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 25 September 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Cup Day is tomorrow, and the twelve seedlings have not been idle:

 
This should be Tomatoes-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Tomatoes 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 601 x 449, 186 kB
Dimensions of original: 4625 x 3456, 3829 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 5 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Tomatoes-3.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Tomatoes 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 223 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4609, 4947 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 5 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Time to plant some and give the rest away. Yvonne and Chris Bahlo are off to Garvoc tomorrow to pick up a horse from Nele Kömle, so we'll send four plants for Nele. Chris only wants one, but it looks like we can get rid of two more with Pene Kirk.


Tuesday, 6 November 2018 Dereel Images for 6 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Another bloody power failure!
Topic: general, technology, opinion Link here

This morning was a day to trim my beard. Grabbed the trimmer, idly wondering whether it was worth fixing the old one that had suddenly just decided not to run any more. Clearly a wiring issue, but why bother fixing them when they're so cheap...

Plugged in the trimmer. Nothing. Exactly the same symptoms. Power failure? No, other things were running, including the water pump. But on checking, discovered eventually that the circuit breaker for one circuit had tripped. Damn! Why did that happen?

And, of course, it was the one circuit to which eureka was connected. I didn't have it on the main UPS circuits because that UPS keeps fluctuating (switching on and off based on the power input?), and that causes the second-in-line UPS to beep, so I had moved it to the other circuit. If it had been on the primary UPS circuit, nothing would have happened.

Fortunately, this time the fsck went smoothly, and an hour later I was back online. But I'm left wondering: my decision to use standard UFS (without journaling) was based on the assumption that I would almost never have a crash. And that's just not the case.

So what do I do? Everybody tells me to migrate to ZFS. But that scares me, and it seems to require ridiculous compute resources. Maybe a NAS box? Clearly things can't go on like this.


Ashampoo examined more carefully
Topic: photography, technology, opinion Link here

Yesterday's fun with Ashampoo video optimizer had me wondering. In the past I had noticed stuff like that, where characters echo at about one every 30 seconds. So today I tried again. And sure enough, to get my extended trial period took me 27 minutes before my cut and paste had echoed and I was allowed to click on the Next button. And after that, another 4 minutes before the application actually started.

Then it seemed to react normally. But can I be bothered? Not today. Peter Jeremy pointed me to FFmpeg, which can extract stills from videos. That's the second recommendation. I should take a look.


More tomatoes
Topic: gardening Link here

Yvonne off to see Nele Kömle today, as planted, taking five tomato plants with her, four for Nele and one for Chris Bahlo. Now I only had six left over, two for Pene Kirk. One was already planted, and I planted two more.

Here's the one that I planted a week ago, and now:

 
This should be Tomatoes.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Tomatoes
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 245 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4608, 5597 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 27 October 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Tomatoes-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Tomatoes 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 253 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3457, 6095 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 7 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

It's not clear how much the plant has changed; I'd guess that it has grown. But what's very clear are other plants around it. I counted no less than 17 volunteer descendents of last year's plant. What do I do with them?

Here the new ones:

 
This should be Tomatoes-3.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Tomatoes 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 210 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4608, 5627 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 7 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Tomatoes-5.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Tomatoes 5
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 234 kB
Dimensions of original: 3458 x 4608, 5792 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 7 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Also planted one of the snow pea plants that Petra Gietz gave us, but they still look very fragile:

 
This should be Snow-peas.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Snow peas
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 222 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 4883 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 7 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry


Wednesday, 7 November 2018 Dereel Images for 7 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

The demise of the Micro Four Thirds system?
Topic: photography, opinion Link here

A couple of months ago Tony and Chelsea Northrup produced a discussion of MIRRORLESS WARS, in which they predicted the demise of the Micro Four Thirds system. That wasn't enough: they have now produced a second one titled “Micro Four-Thirds is DEAD”.

Is he right? First I need to hear what he has to say, so I watched the entire clip. There's some interesting stuff, but not enough for a blow-by-blow discussion. In many respects I can't agree with his arguments.

One of the big ones is “A manufacturer will not tell you when he's going to stop production of a product”, and he points to Panasonic's introduction of the new Lumix S series, still under development. Why would they jump into that market if they weren't thinking of stopping production of the Micro Four Thirds system?

Well, their CEO made that clear: there's an opportunity. He expects that Micro Four Thirds will continue to be the mainstay of their camera production. And the fact that they're bringing out a 10-25 mm f/1.7 zoom lens—the world's fastest zoom—lends weight to that claim.

Then Tony goes on to state that the reason for smaller sensors in the first place was just because the sensors themselves were so expensive to make that they were a significant part of the camera price, and now that has changed. Is he right? He could be, but I didn't know that. When I chose the Four Thirds system in 2007, that was not a factor. Innovation was.

But Tony says that small sensors produce bad results. He also says that mobile phone cameras produce surprisingly good results. Which is it to be? Four Thirds has a quarter of the area of a full frame sensor. The current best mobile phone camera on DxOMark's site is the Xiaomi Mi MIX 3 with a 1/2.55 sensor, about 8.7% of the size of a Four Thirds sensor.

The other thing that Tony doesn't appear to understand is that sensor performance is dependent on pixel size, not sensor dimensions. The Four Thirds sensor has an area of 224.9 mm², so a 20 MP sensor will have pixels of 11.2 μm². A full frame sensor has an area of (frequently marginally less than) 864 mm², so a 45.7 MP sensor like on the Nikon Z7 would have a pixel size of 18.9 μm². Not as big a difference as it might seem. On the other hand, the Xiaomi pixels, despite the relatively low resolution of 12 MP, has pixels about 1.62 μm² in size.

And then he gets on to lens sizes. Micro Four Thirds lenses are no smaller than full frame lenses, he says. To prove his point, he drags out an Olympus 300 mm f/4 and a Nikon 600 mm f/4. This image from the 43rumours discussion:

 
This should be Northrup-1.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Northrup 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 693 x 389, 483 kB
Dimensions of original: 1209 x 679, 985 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 6 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Huh? What has he been smoking? Oh, no, you can't compare an f/4 full frame lens with a Micro Four Thirds f/4 lens. There's this thing about equivalent aperture. You need to compare it with an f/8 lens.

Sorry, Tony, but this is stupid. I'll write a separate rant on the subject, but basically there are two ways to measure aperture: by the amount of light it lets in (the standard method) or by the relative depth of field. And for reasons I really don't understand, some people use the depth-of-field criterion. In this case, it seems that Tony is saying that depth of field (or rather, lack of it) is more important than exposure.

Sure, shallow depth of field can be useful in composition, but for me it's been the bane of my life. I see the increased depth of field of Micro Four Thirds cameras as an advantage. It certainly is in the case of long telephoto photography. But never mind, that goes against Tony's argument. He says that to compare the cameras, you need to compare full frame lenses with Micro Four Thirds lenses with half the aperture (for example, 50 mm f/2.8 FF with 25 mm f/1.4 Micro Four Thirds). And there's the problem: there are effectively no 50 mm f/2.8 full frame lenses.

I did a bit of comparison and came up with a Canon EOS R with a Canon TSE 135 mm f/4 and an Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II) with an M.Zuiko Digital ED 75 mm f/1.8, which, according to Tony, would correspond to a full frame 150 mm f/3.4, both larger “equivalent aperture” and equivalent focal length, so it should be bigger than the Canon lens (here), and then the Sigma 50 mm f/2.8 EX DG with the Leica Summilux 25 mm f/1.4 (here):

 
This should be Oly-Canon-lens.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Oly Canon lens
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 501 x 540, 197 kB
Dimensions of original: 814 x 877, 357 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 6 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Oly-Canon-lens-2.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Oly Canon lens 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 564 x 479, 200 kB
Dimensions of original: 816 x 693, 289 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 6 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Yup, when Tony's right, he's right. This time he's wrong even according to his own strange standards.

The next point that Tony makes is a good one: research and development for new equipment is expensive, and to be amortized it needs large sales figures. So now that Panasonic has gone the full frame way, it's clear that they'll give up on Micro Four Thirds within 12 months. Never mind what the CEOs say about relative market, never mind the fact that they've spread their costs by going along with Leica and Sigma.

And Olympus is going down a “lonely path” with Micro Four Thirds. They're too expensive. The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II costs (US) $2000, but it can't keep up with the Sony A7 III, which costs the same.

OK, we can check what other people think about that. Here is a good comparison. Summarizing (my choice):

Camera       E-M1 Mark II       A7 III
Price (B&H)       $1,599       $1,998
Better lens selection      
Still frame rate       60.6 f/s       9.9 f/s

So it's not really clear that the A7 III is the Olympus killer, and his price claims don't hold out.

But no, Micro Four Thirds will be dead within 5 years. That's why Olympus has not started on any alternative route, of course. And if small sensors are no longer worthwhile, what's Fujifilm doing?

Of course there have been other people who disagree. This rebuttal by Joseph Ellis goes into some detail about his claims.

First, the dangers of mobile phones: that battle is over. Mobile phones won. Micro Four Thirds is still here.

Then, Tony is far too fixated on sensors. The mobile phone battle shows that pretty much any sensor is good enough, and the difference in quality between individual sensors is no longer what it was.

Instead there are other factors, like weather sealing (in that connection, it's interesting to note that the EOS R is barely weather sealed, despite its considerably higher price) and multishot functionality like Pro Capture Mode. He didn't mention it, but things like focus stacking and HDR mode also come to mind.

Other aspects that he mentioned are what I have experienced, that users of long telephoto lenses are migrating to smaller cameras because they're easier to use, and that Olympus, in particular, is very innovative, while the big brands are quite conservative. That rings true: that's one of the main reasons I got started with Olympus in the first place.

Regarding “equivalent aperture”, he notes that there's a real epidemic of bokeh (a word that I hadn't heard of before the beginning of this century, and which the OED still doesn't know), and that it's “the enemy of good composition”. But without bokeh (which the US Americans seem to pronounce in two different ways), Tony's main size argument falls even flatter.

And maybe he sums the whole issue up with the statement that the Northrups need to produce something to please their (far too prominent) sponsors: “They've got to create articles that make some buzz and stir things up”

That's probably the best summary of the whole thing. It's a pity, though, since it won't help sales of Micro Four Third cameras.


Wonders of Jalapa
Topic: gardening Link here

Other plants that are coming up in the garden include some Mirabilis jalapa, which stowed away in a pot plant:

 
This should be Mirabilis-jalapa-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Mirabilis jalapa 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 209 kB
Dimensions of original: 4609 x 3456, 4161 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 7 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

They're not the only ones. Around one of the pots I found this:

 
This should be Mirabilis-jalapa-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Mirabilis jalapa 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 236 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 6164 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 7 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That's many small plants. I think I'll leave them there until they finish flowering, and then dig out the bulbs.


Cockatoos!
Topic: animals Link here

There are plenty of Sulphur-crested cockatoos in Victoria, but they normally don't come very close. But a couple of days ago, one flew past me so close that I thought he would hit me. And today, while walking the dogs, I saw this:

 
This should be Cockatoo-2-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Cockatoo 2 detail
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 431 x 626, 127 kB
Dimensions of original: 1409 x 2046, 564 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 7 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Cockatoo-12-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Cockatoo 12 detail
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 497 x 543, 149 kB
Dimensions of original: 1127 x 1231, 398 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 7 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That was just at the entrance to the driveway, and the bird was one of two or three, only about 6 m away. They seemed to be interested in the bark of the tree, or maybe some secretion. I wonder if we'll see more of them.


Thursday, 8 November 2018 Dereel Images for 8 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Welcome Ruth
Topic: general Link here

Ruth Viebrock arrived today almost as planned. We had spent some time looking at flightradar24, which disagreed with the flight schedule. Of course the (British Airways) schedule was wrong: BA7410, leaving HKG at 18:05 yesterday and arriving at MEL this morning at 6:35. Problem: it was code shared with Qantas QF30, leaving HKG at 19:00 and arriving at 7:30. How do people make such a mess?

In fact, she took off at 19:29 arrived at 7:07, though British Airways reported completely different times, but too late to catch the 7:45 shuttle to Ballarat, so Yvonne went off to meet the next bus at 10:35. Not there: there had been a pileup on the freeway, they had to take a deviation, and the staff member at the station had no idea when they would arrive (or of much else, it appears). But she ended up arriving only about 10 minutes late.


Australian animals for Ruth
Topic: animals Link here

Ruth is overjoyed to be in a place that she previously only knew from photos. And being an animal lover, of course she wanted to see Australian animals. The first one we encountered was while walking the dogs:


This should be Snake-2-detail-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Snake 2 detail 1          Dimensions:          1076 x 251, 232 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Thursday, 8 November 2018, thumbnails          All images taken on Thursday, 8 November 2018, small
Diary entry for Thursday, 8 November 2018 Complete exposure details

   
This should be Snake-2-detail-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Snake 2 detail 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 689 x 392, 174 kB
Dimensions of original: 647 x 368, 145 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 8 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

A black snake (Pseudechis)! I don't know when I last saw one. It must be well over 10 years ago. But they're very poisonous, and we gave it a wide berth.

Later on Ruth saw some kangaroos at a distance in our paddocks, so she has the definite feeling of being in Australia.


Tony Northrup again
Topic: photography, opinion Link here

To my surprise, people on IRC were relatively interested in yesterday's article on the Micro Four Thirds system. I knew that Jashank Jeremy has one, and by extension Peter Jeremy supports the system. And it seems that Daniel O'Connor also bought one for his daughter (a Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5), and has also invested in a couple of lenses. So clearly they're interested, but it's also an indication that the system is popular. I may have influenced Jashank with his purchase, but Daniel didn't even buy the same brand.

Some discussion on IRC, in which (for once) everybody agreed with me, and one overriding concept came out of the discussion: Tony Northrup is fixated on sensor size, to a point where his other arguments don't make sense. R&D costs? The best way to reduce them is for makers to cooperate, and that's exactly what Micro Four Thirds does. Nearly all new full-frame mirrorless cameras (Nikon, Canon) continue the old line of one maker, one system.

I need to think about this more and update my article.


Activating a SIM card for Ruth
Topic: general, technology, opinion Link here

One of the first things we wanted to do for Ruth was to activate a SIM card for her telephone. OK, finally a use for the free Vodafone SIM that I got with my new phone.

The first thing you need to do is to activate it, of course. The recommended way is “Insert the SIM into your device, switch it on and follow the prompts”. OK, insert, switch on. Nothing exciting happens.

Is that because there's no coverage? Or does it expect to be put into a Nokia 3? I could try activation online, but that way madness lies. Instead I took the ALDI SIM that I had bought for this eventuality and put it into the phone. All OK, please activate. This time I tried the online method and was asked to provide a credit card number so that they could deduct a random sum to be used as a password, then to be refunded.

Been there, done that. It takes for ever. So I tried the phone approach instead (2534, free call, works even when not activated). Connected to <mumble>. How do you spell that? <mumble><mumble><mumble>. Lee? No, finally it turned out to be Fay. I don't have any issue with outsourcing phone support services to countries where English is not the main language, but I wish they'd choose people whom I could understand.

The first thing that she wanted was a “Security PIN”. I've never heard of one of those before on this service; maybe it's because I avoid phone contact. She wasn't very helpful, and finally I gave up and decided to bite the bullet and deduct the sum from my credit card.

But that didn't work. Something went wrong (!), as they said.

 
This should be ALDImobile-2.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: ALDImobile 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 790 x 342, 41 kB
Dimensions of original: 591 x 256, 11 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 8 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

What? They're too polite to say. Tried again. Same thing. Different browser. Another different browser. Another system. Always the same thing.

Dammit, call them up again, and this time <mumble>'s name proved to be Marly. Some script again. I asked to be connected to a supervisor, but no, she could help me. I had to ask three times and threaten to complain to the TIO before I was finally connected to Martin, who was in fact quite helpful. The reason for this business in the first place was a discrepancy between my name on the driver license (GREGORY P LEHEY) and on my account (Greg Lehey). And the deduction didn't work because the last <mumble> had cancelled the order. And yes, I need to do the deduction, but he can do that for me. That involved resetting my password, but that's not an issue.

Only the deduction didn't show up on my account. That's not surprising, but it means waiting until tomorrow before I can continue.


Friday, 9 November 2018 Dereel → Cape Clear → Berringa → fDereel Images for 9 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Spring planting
Topic: gardening Link here

Mick the gardener along today, this time with the task of planting many plants in the garden—in fact, so many that I wasn't sure where to put them all. We put the Hibiscus rosa-sinensis in the bed on the north side of the house. Both required to be propped up:

 
This should be Hibiscus-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Hibiscus 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 449 x 602, 220 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4636, 6154 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Hibiscus-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Hibiscus 2
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 215 kB
Dimensions of original: 3457 x 4608, 5805 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The second one also looks rather unhappy:

 
This should be Hibiscus-2-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Hibiscus 2 detail
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 529 x 511, 149 kB
Dimensions of original: 1125 x 1086, 363 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Mike didn't water any of the plants, so I did it later; hopefully it will recover.

Then there were the couple of creepers that I had grown from cuttings. Unfortunately I don't know what each is, so we'll have to wait for them to flower:

 
This should be Creeper-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Creeper 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 235 kB
Dimensions of original: 3890 x 5184, 10696 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 10 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Creeper-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Creeper 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 251 kB
Dimensions of original: 3890 x 5184, 10640 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 10 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The first one is barely visible at the right side of the arch.

In front of the second creeper we did a second attempt at a row of Cannas, since the first ones (surprisingly) didn't do very well:

 
This should be Cannas.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Cannas
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 216 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 12021 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 10 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Then a Pelargonium that Yvonne had found somewhere:

 
This should be Pelargonium.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Pelargonium
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 247 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3890, 12046 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 10 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

It, too, is looking surprisingly unhappy, but I'm sure that it will recover.

And finally some more tomatoes, not quite in the order in which I had wanted them:

 
This should be Tomatoes.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Tomatoes
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 239 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 14335 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 10 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry


Nikolai to the vets again
Topic: animals, general, opinion Link here

Nikolai has been biting himself on the behind for a while, for no obvious reason. Today off to see Pene Kirk, in the process introducing her to Ruth and getting rid of the last of our tomato plants.

We couldn't find much wrong with Niko, so Pene shaved the area and put on some cortisone ointment, which will hopefully do the trick:

 
This should be Nikolai-and-Pene-5.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Nikolai and Pene 5
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 143 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4608, 4735 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Took a different way back, despite Yvonne's objections, to show Ruth a little more of the countryside. In Berringa I couldn't find my way home:


This should be Lost-in-Berringa-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Lost in Berringa 1          Dimensions:          939 x 288, 164 kB Display location on map
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Friday, 9 November 2018, thumbnails          All images taken on Friday, 9 November 2018, small
Diary entry for Friday, 9 November 2018 Complete exposure details

   
This should be Lost-in-Berringa-1-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Lost in Berringa 1 detail
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 444 x 609, 169 kB
Dimensions of original: 520 x 713, 191 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

For once I didn't have my GPS navigator with me, and I wasn't really sure where we were. Followed the sign to Dereel and ended up in a little track far too reminiscent of Westons Road in Dereel on 4 July 2014, where we ended up like this:

 
This should be Wedged-car.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Wedged car
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 174 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 4976 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 4 July 2014:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Managed to turn around, and then I asked my phone, which really helped, though it's still fiddlier than with a real navigator. It seems that somebody had rotated the signpost.

Past Mount Misery Creek Bridge again, which, I was going to say, has further declined (like I did the last couple of times), but in fact there's not much difference. Here this time last year and then today:

 
This should be Misery-Creek-bridge.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Misery Creek bridge
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 602 x 449, 229 kB
Dimensions of original: 5215 x 3888, 9678 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 14 October 2017:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Misery-Creek-Bridge.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Misery Creek Bridge
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 211 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 9544 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Then looking for spider orchids (a term that I haven't been able to uniquely identify, probably a Caladenia atrovespa or Caladenia attingens) where I had found them two years ago.

 
This should be Caladenia-tentaculata-14.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Caladenia tentaculata 14
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 601, 84 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4612, 1198 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 12 November 2016:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

We found almost nothing. I had assumed that it was because it was earlier in the year last time I was there, but in fact it was on 12 November. The difference must be the dryness this year.

About the only things I did find were these:

 
This should be Wildflowers-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Wildflowers 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 119 kB
Dimensions of original: 4611 x 3456, 2254 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Wildflowers-4.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Wildflowers 4
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 449, 96 kB
Dimensions of original: 4614 x 3456, 2690 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Wildflowers-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Wildflowers 2
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 111 kB
Dimensions of original: 4611 x 3456, 2500 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Wildflowers-3.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Wildflowers 3
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 140 kB
Dimensions of original: 4611 x 3456, 2525 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Wildflowers-5.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Wildflowers 5
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 208 kB
Dimensions of original: 4613 x 3456, 3527 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

What are they? No idea.


ALDImobile activation, day 2
Topic: general, technology, opinion Link here

First thing in the morning I checked my bank account for the promised deduction from ALDImobile. Nothing. There was other activity, but not from ALDImobile.

Dammit, what now? Nothing for it, I had to brave their phone help service. This time <mumble>'s name proved to be Ann. Why is it so difficult to understand these names? I have never been able to understand them when they announce themselves, and I almost invariably need them to spell it for me.

She, too, went through her script and wanted me to do the same thing I had tried twice before. Once again I got fed up and asked for a supervisor, and once again she insisted that she could help.

Finally she put me through. This time <mumble> proved to be called Ethel, and how about that, she was able to perform the activation there and then! Another change of password, of course, which, compared to the previous one, suggests that their generated passwords consist of 4 random digits, initials of customer in capitals, two lower case letters and a ?. For me, the two lower case letters were am in each case, for something like 0815GLam?.

Finally through. The moral of the story?


New Melaleuca
Topic: gardening Link here

Walking the dogs today I saw an interesting plant:

 
This should be Melaleuca.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Melaleuca
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 232 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 5679 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Melaleuca-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Melaleuca detail
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 738 x 366, 117 kB
Dimensions of original: 905 x 449, 132 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

What is it? From the kind of flower, it has to be a Melaleuca or a Callistemon. I was just surprised to find it there, where we've been past hundreds of times before.


Overflowing ice
Topic: food and drink, opinion Link here

Freezing chicken stock in small pieces is the only way to go. It's easy to portion and easy to thaw out. Today I froze 5 pieces of about 200 g each. But this one was interesting:

 
This should be Frozen-stock-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Frozen stock 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 163 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 4791 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Frozen-stock-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Frozen stock 2
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 105 kB
Dimensions of original: 4611 x 3456, 6210 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 9 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

How did that happen? The left hand side was facing the door of the freezer, where it's clearly not quite as cold. So as the liquid on the right froze, it pushed its way out of the left hand side and over the edge.


Saturday, 10 November 2018 Dereel Images for 10 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Camera crash!
Topic: photography, general Link here

While taking my house photos this morning, something terrible happened: while I was carrying the tripod over my shoulder, with the camera overhead, the panorama bracket parted company with the tripod, and the whole assembly, including camera, lens and remote control, fell to the ground, taking a couple of photos on the way:

 
This should be crash-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: crash 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 113 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 3318 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 10 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be crash-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: crash 2
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 153 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 6437 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 10 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

$3000 worth of photographic equipment! How much damage?

The obvious things were that the remote control lost its battery cover and batteries (seen on the photos above), and the rail lost an adjusting screw. Nothing obvious at all on the camera or lens!

Further examination showed that the adjusting screw is held in place with a clip, and the rail and remote control weren't damaged. And the camera? After careful examination, all I could find was this:

 
This should be Viewfinder-5.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Viewfinder 5
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 129 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 2006 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 10 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The rubber cup round the viewfinder had been pulled to one side on the left,showing the clip underneath. After replacing it, it was a little crumpled:

 
This should be Viewfinder-8.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Viewfinder 8
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 99 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 1902 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 10 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

And that was all! Even that went away after a while. How lucky can you be? Took many more photos, and clearly there's nothing wrong inside the camera. But I'll certainly check the tripod mount three times in future.


More Hugin strangenesses
Topic: photography, technology, opinion Link here

Processing my house photos has got a lot easier since I created my batch scripts. Now I do a make pto and just have to do minor adjustments before the scripts continue. But from time to time I get really strange results. Here the house from the entrance:

 
This should be Hugin-1.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Hugin 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 693 x 390, 377 kB
Dimensions of original: 1920 x 1080, 2493 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 10 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Why is it upside-down? Tried various things, but somehow they didn't work. In the end I edited the project file with Emacs, changing the orientation of the individual images. Here one of them:

--- Hugin/house-from-entrance.pto~      2018-11-10 12:20:00.222276000 +1100
+++ Hugin/house-from-entrance.pto       2018-11-12 12:03:35.190438000 +1100
@@ -5,13 +5,13 @@

 # image lines
 #-hugin  cropFactor=2.00308
-i w5182 h3885 f3 v126.811512466541 Ra0 Rb0 Rc0 Rd0 Re0 Eev11.9366378213403 Er1 Eb1 r178.950393178411 p4.12238129606885 y-75.5161071842899 TrX0 TrY0 TrZ0 Tpy0 Tpp0 j0 a0 b-0.0331988153129906 c0 d-3.63558774910979 e83.9426169915306 g0 t0 Va1 Vb0 Vc0 Vd0 Vx0 Vy0  Vm5 n"C/house-from-entrance-0.tiff"
+i w5182 h3885 f3 v126.811512466541 Ra0 Rb0 Rc0 Rd0 Re0 Eev11.9366378213403 Er1 Eb1 r0 p4.12238129606885 y-75.5161071842899 TrX0 TrY0 TrZ0 Tpy0 Tpp0 j0 a0 b-0.0331988153129906 c0 d-3.63558774910979 e83.9426169915306 g0 t0 Va1 Vb0 Vc0 Vd0 Vx0 Vy0  Vm5 n"C/house-from-entrance-0.tiff"

That gave me this:

 
This should be Hugin-2.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Hugin 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 693 x 390, 347 kB
Dimensions of original: 1920 x 1080, 2257 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 10 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

They're the right way up, but the positions are wrong. But running another alignment fixed that:

 
This should be Hugin-3.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Hugin 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 693 x 390, 375 kB
Dimensions of original: 1920 x 1080, 2495 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 10 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

But why does this even happen?


The three riders
Topic: animals, general Link here

A visitation from three riders this afternoon:

 
This should be Three-riders-6.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Three riders 6
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 602 x 449, 112 kB
Dimensions of original: 5215 x 3888, 3969 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 10 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Why three? It seems that in this case, at any rate, there are four of all good things.

The background: Margaret Swan has lent Keldan (on the right) to Ruth for the duration of her stay here, and they had brought them over from Chris Bahlo's place.


Dinner for seven
Topic: food and drink Link here

Chris Bahlo along for dinner today as usual on a Saturday. Christmas tide is with us, of course, and has been for about a month, and we had bought various deep-frozen poultry specialties. Today had a stuffed turkey roast, with cranberry and apple filling, enough for 7 portions. It was quite boring, but that didn't stop it from going away. Between the 3½ of us (Yvonne hardly eats anything) we nearly finished it. Not to be repeated.


Sunday, 11 November 2018 Dereel → Ballarat → Dereel Images for 11 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Ballarat Bird World again
Topic: animals, photography Link here

Off this morning with Ruth to visit the Ballarat Bird World for the first time in a while; we've been there three times before, all in the relatively short period of time 9 May 2010 to 11 Februrary 2011.

It's an interesting place, but they have always had financial problems, and now they're only open on the weekend. It used to be run by an old married couple, but it seems that the wife died about a year ago, and now the children are taking over the place. Interestingly, on checking the web site, I find that the old pair were Paul and Joan Sperber (nomen est omen? Sperber is German for sparrow hawk). Our car repairman at Ballarat Automotive is also called Paul Sperber. And so is one of old Paul's sons. What are the chances that there are three Paul Sperbers in Ballarat? Could it be that Paul Jr. and Lisa are taking over the operation, or could it be Edward, Paul Jr's younger brother?

Hopefully they'll be able to make a go of it; there was almost nobody there today. And for the first time we couldn't go into the cockatoo cage, but Yvonne had her fun with a Major Mitchell:

Went through rather faster than I had expected: I had brought my Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400 mm f/4.0-6.3 with me to get some photos of the birds in the aviary, but there seemed to be very few there. Were they hiding, or are there really only about 10 in total?

In any case, I was quite happy with the results:

 
This should be Ballarat-Bird-World-23.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Ballarat Bird World 23
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 136 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 3445 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 11 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Ballarat-Bird-World-28.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Ballarat Bird World 28
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 169 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 3849 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 11 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Ballarat-Bird-World-32.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Ballarat Bird World 32
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 150 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 4127 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 11 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Ballarat-Bird-World-37.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Ballarat Bird World 37
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 140 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 3963 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 11 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

In particular, the depth of field was about what I would expect. Thinking back to Tony Northrup's claims a few days ago, I'd like to know which Nikon lens he would have used to get these results. The last photo was taken at 1/25 s, focal length 400 mm (full frame equivalent 800 mm). What lenses of that focal length are available for Nikon? I looked at this a couple of months ago: the AF-S NIKKOR 800mm f/5.6E FL ED VR (“surprisingly compact” at 4.59 kg) for only USD $17,000. Clearly an absolute specialist lens. At least it has image stabilization (which Nikon calls “vibration reduction”), so it's not clear that it couldn't also have taken this photo. But who can carry a lens like that around with him?


Hey Google! Botanical Gardens!
Topic: technology, opinion Link here

We were finished at Ballarat Bird World earlier than I had expected. What now? Off to the Botanical Gardens? How do we get there? It's on the other side of town, and though I could find my way with no difficulty, I couldn't think of an optimum way. I hadn't learnt from my experience on Friday, and I still didn't have my GPS navigator with me. OK, what's Google good for? Hey, Google, take me to the Botanical Gardens.

It didn't say very much, but showed me a map. In which direction should I set off? It was too polite to assume that I didn't know. In this case I did, of course: we were in a dead end street, so there was only one way to go. After that I got quite reasonable instructions. Hey, Google, thank you. After some consideration, “You're welcome”.

Ruth sees this as proof that mobile telephones are the way to go. That's significantly overstating the case, especially since the directions weren't optimal. In particular, the lack of a map is a nuisance. I had it in my pocket, but even if I had mounted it on the dashboard, the map would be too small to be useful. Still, it's definitely useful.


Botanical Gardens again
Topic: gardening Link here

To the Botanical Gardens, also for the first time in a while. Down the Prime Ministers' avenue, where it seems that Tony Abbott so shocked the sculptor that he gave up; at least the past two prime ministers are not yet there. And by comparison, the days of Honest John seem positively nostalgic:

 
This should be Ruth-Johnnie-Howard-Yvonne-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Ruth Johnnie Howard Yvonne 2
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 609 x 444, 239 kB
Dimensions of original: 5093 x 3711, 5594 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 11 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

In the Statuary Pavilion, found another Ruth:

 
This should be Two-Ruths-3.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Two Ruths 3
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 445 x 607, 167 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5306, 4372 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 11 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The Friends were selling plants again, and in to say hello. Yvonne Curbach was there, of course, and I introduced Ruth, discovering that Yvonne isn't Dutch after all: she's Indonesian, and though her first language is Dutch, she doesn't like Holland much. Also saw Lorraine Powell. And of course we bought some plants (now $8!): a Fuchsia triphylla and a more normal Fuchsia.

Burnt leaves and weeding
Topic: gardening, opinion Link here

Back home planted the normal Fuchsia in front of the house:

 
This should be Fuchsias.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Fuchsias
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 222 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 6606 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 12 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That's the Fuchsia triphylla on the left.

Also noted with mild concern the way the leaves of the newly planted tomatoes and Hibiscus rosa-sinensis have gone white:

 
This should be Tomato.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Tomato
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 238 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 6206 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 12 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Hibiscus-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Hibiscus 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 209 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5186, 7765 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 12 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

But there's good new growth on the Hibiscus, the buds are looking a lot happier, and I expect to see some flowers soon:

 
This should be Hibiscus-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Hibiscus 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 87 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 2135 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 12 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Ruth agrees with me that it's probably too much sunlight for the old leaves.

Ruth also showed another very positive trait. She loves weeding:

 
This should be Ruth-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Ruth 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 264 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3890, 8286 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 11 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

She's welcome here.


Blow-dry Wiener Schnitzel
Topic: food and drink, opinion Link here

Wiener Schnitzel for dinner today. Once again I tried some of them in the “digital air fryer”. And once again they tasted better than the ones that were just deep fried. The down side is that the basket only has enough space for three small Schnitzel, and without fat you can't layer them. But it's worth thinking of alternatives.


Monday, 12 November 2018 Dereel Images for 12 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Braving the elements
Topic: gardening Link here

We have planted some of our snow pea plants, but they still look very delicate. Now, however, the ones still in the house are starting to flower. To my surprise, it wasn't even the first flower. There's also a pod on the plant:

 
This should be Snow-peas-5.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Snow peas 5
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 152 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3457, 3306 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 13 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Snow-peas-6.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Snow peas 6
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 449, 117 kB
Dimensions of original: 4615 x 3456, 3379 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 13 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Time to plant them? No, it seems. The ones that I planted three days ago have not exactly improved, and neither have the creepers:

 
This should be Snow-peas-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Snow peas 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 186 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4608, 2958 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 13 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Snow-peas-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Snow peas 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 226 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4608, 6030 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 13 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Creeper-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Creeper 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 140 kB
Dimensions of original: 3456 x 4608, 2787 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 13 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Why? And what can I do about it?


Tuesday, 13 November 2018 Dereel Images for 13 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

The four horsemen, finally
Topic: animals Link here

Nele Kömle showed up this morning, primarily to do something with Chris Bahlo, but of course they didn't miss the opportunity to go riding. Finally we have the Four Horse(wo)men:

 
This should be Four-riders-22.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Four riders 22
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 162 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 4756 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 13 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

We didn't get round to assigning names. In principle Chris should be war, but she was in civvies today. Then there are questions of colour, which are more complicated than I realized. But there was no white (grey) horse, and assigning the colours red, black and “pale” to the others is difficult enough.


The joys of GPS tracking
Topic: technology, opinion Link here

Ruth took her mobile phone with her riding and recorded the track with an app called Runtastic. She showed it to me on her phone, and the map didn't look bad. I asked her to send me the log. How do you do that? How, indeed? Despite the obvious contradiction, mobile phones are surprisingly isolated. But no, she found a way to send it to me as an email:

Ruth hat ein runtastisches Reiten über 5,83 km in 48m 18s absolviert

https://www.runtastic.com/sport-sessions/4a6e4acc-5caa-4360-9c66-7f3cea9b75ff?sharing_token=5bea382f3b90413c285a589b&share_locale=de&utm_content=session.runtastic.riding&utm_source=runtastic.lite&utm_medium=gplus.android&utm_campaign=user_generated_sharing

Von meinem Xperia™ von Sony-Smartphone gesendet

Why didn't I look at the HTML version? Why, didn't I look at the HTML version? That was HTML, but they were too polite to put the link in an a tag.

OK, paste the link into a browser. “You're not allowed to see this map. Log in or sign up”. No, sorry, Runtastic, I don't want anything to do with you. I just want to see the log, which is Ruth's private property.

Is it on her phone? It's almost worth searching for. But in the meantime I went to put up my track log for Sunday. I've done this on several occasions using GPS Visualizer and then saved the route as a Google Map. But no, that was yesterday. Now I need an API key.

What a pain! The signup took me the best part of 30 minutes (admittedly much longer because I collected screen shots and tried out various things that no sane person would do).

The first time round, the web site hung after I pressed (presumably the wrong) CONTINUE button:

 
This should be Google-maps-2.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Google maps 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 615 x 439, 90 kB
Dimensions of original: 686 x 490, 46 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 13 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

After that, things seemed to go around in circles. I seemed to get this page several times with slightly different reactions:

 
This should be Google-maps-3.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Google maps 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 634 x 426, 74 kB
Dimensions of original: 567 x 381, 34 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 13 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Google-maps-5.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Google maps 5
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 630 x 429, 61 kB
Dimensions of original: 505 x 344, 24 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 13 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

And then it wanted my credit card number (“just checking”):

 
This should be Google-maps-6.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Google maps 6
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 777 x 348, 108 kB
Dimensions of original: 485 x 217, 19 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 13 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Sorry, Google, I really don't trust you. But it's documented here that you want the number (be careful not to lose it!). So I entered my credit card number the way it is on the credit card, with spaces after every group of four digits. And like always (web programmers seem to live in an alternate universe), it flagged “credit card number invalid”.

This time, however, it proved that it was right. I had a typo in the number. Fix that, and it accepted the card number with spaces. One point to Google. It seems that it checks whatever inbuilt validity checks there are in credit card numbers (checksum? CRC?).

But it still wasn't happy:


This should be Google-maps-10.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Google maps 10          Dimensions:          1081 x 250, 56 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Tuesday, 13 November 2018, thumbnails          All images taken on Tuesday, 13 November 2018, small
Diary entry for Tuesday, 13 November 2018 Complete exposure details

 

OK, Google, what does “optional” mean? Deduct one point from Google. So I gave it my answer-only phone number and was finally presented with:

 
This should be Google-maps-11.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Google maps 11
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 758 x 356, 69 kB
Dimensions of original: 545 x 256, 22 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Tuesday, 13 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

10 APIs! I'm reminded of xkcd:

Image

But then it was done, and finally I was presented with:


This should be Google-maps-14.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Google maps 14          Dimensions:          1281 x 211, 72 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Tuesday, 13 November 2018, thumbnails          All images taken on Tuesday, 13 November 2018, small
Diary entry for Tuesday, 13 November 2018 Complete exposure details

 

There was no option to reply. Clearly it doesn't want to know much about me.

And finally I have my map, except that I can no longer embed it in a web page (or if I can, they've done a good job of hiding it):

 
This should be track.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: track
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 574 x 470, 555 kB
Dimensions of original: 1473 x 1206, 2920 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 11 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

It's not clear what the purpose of the apple symbol at bottom left is, but it doesn't produce a menu. Apart from that, the map doesn't seem to be very accurate either. But I suppose that's what you get for having your GPS receiver in your shirt pocket. And the straight line in the middle of the noose? “Sorry, forgot where I was” on the part of the phone.

Sigh


Sex party next weekend?
Topic: politics, opinion Link here

While walking the dogs, got a strange phone call. In fact, any call on my mobile phone is strange. I've forgotten the name of the caller, but he said that he was from the Reason Party. What? Oh, how about a sex party? Do I know that? No, at any rate not as a political party.

It seems that somebody has put me down as a sympathizer or similar, and he didn't just want me to vote for them: he wanted me to help on election day (next Saturday). He had my phone number (obviously) and my canonical email address. I asked him to send me some information, but I didn't receive any.


Wednesday, 14 November 2018 Dereel Images for 14 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Another circuit breaker trip
Topic: general, opinion Link here

Once again this morning the circuit breaker for the kitchen (and much of the house) had tripped. Now that eureka is on a different circuit, it's no longer as serious as I had feared. But what is it? Last time I had suspected the bore pump, but it's definitely not that, and the other pump is on a different circuit.


New caquelon
Topic: food and drink, opinion Link here

Ruth's been here for nearly a week now, but today was the first real opportunity that we had to inaugurate the new caquelon that she brought with her (to replace the old one that we damaged a couple of months ago:

 
This should be Ruth-Yvonne-fondue-5.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Ruth Yvonne fondue 5
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 173 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 4544 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 14 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The fondue tasted as good as ever, but the differences in the caqlelons were clear: on the old one, the réligieuse looked more like a monk's tonsure, because the base wasn't perfectly flat. It also took some lifting. The new one (still) has a perfectly flat and smooth base, so the réligieuse was too, and it was easy to remove.

The most interesting thing, though, was the recipe booklet included with the caquelon. Some of the recipes look pretty bizarre, but the first one („Fondue - das Traditionelle“ / « Fondue - La traditionelle ») was surprising because it was almost identical to our own. That might seem obvious, but there's so much junk out there that the similarity is amazing.

By way of illustration, the first few Google hits I have for cheese fondue recipe. All recipes are for four people unless otherwise noted:

  1. BBC:

    1 clove       garlic, halved
    290ml/½ pint       white wine
    1 tsp       lemon juice
    225g/8oz       emmental cheese grated
    225g/8oz       gruyère cheese grated
    1 tsp       cornflour
    1 tbsp       kirsch (optional)

    Apart from the use of obsolete units (with a sting in the tail for US readers: the ½ pint is the Imperial pint, round 20% more than the US Customary pint, and theoretically capable of ruining the dish), the choice of cheese is not just suboptimal, it's wrong: never use Emmental cheese in a fondue. And even for US readers, the quantity of wine is too much. For 450 g of cheese you need between 200 and 225 ml of wine. I won't comment on other details of the recipe, like boiling the little Kirsch with the fondue to completely destroy the flavour. And the quantities are far too small for the claimed 4 people. You need about 200 g of cheese per person (though at home we use a little over 300 g total because Yvonne doesn't eat much).

  2. Sandra Bernard's classic French cheese fondue (an attribution presumably made by SBS, who are good at these things) is better: 800 g Gruyère cheese, but nothing else, and 375 ml of wine to go with it. But only one kind of cheese? Possible, not ideal.

    1       garlic clove
    800 g       Gruyère cheese (or a cheese with a sweet, fruity flavour)
    375 ml       dry white wine
    1 tbsp       cornflour
    4 tbsp       Kirschwasser (cherry liqueur)

    Still, this one looks reasonably OK, just different from ours.

  3. This recipe turns me off even before I read the recipe itself:

    Easy cheese fondue recipe with white wine is a perfect gourmet appetizer that you can make at home!

    The ingredients are similar to the first:

    1       Garlic Clove, grated
    1 cup       dry White Wine
    200 grams / .4 pounds       Emmentaler cheese (at room temperature)
    200 grams / .4 pounds       Gruyère cheese (at room temperature)
    50 grams / .1 pound       Smoked Cheddar (at room temperature)
    2 tablespoons       Cornstarch
    1 tablespoon fresh       Lemon Juice

    By comparison with the BBC recipe, it uses even less cheese (assuming 4 people), but then they want to eat this heavy dish as an appetizer. A good fondue is pretty much the opposite. Emmental again, and smoked cheddar! Certainly not traditionel.

  4. OK, maybe looking for English-language recipes is a bad idea. How about French? recette fondue fromage? This one is convenient because, although it's originally in French, there's an English translation. On the other hand, even the French version contains cups and spoons and things, making it less plausible. It wants:

    2 small       garlic cloves, lightly crushed
    14 oz (400 g)       cave-aged Gruyère cheese, grated
    3.5 oz (100 g)       Emmentaler Swiss cheese, grated
    3.5 oz (100 g)       Swiss Vacherin cheese, grated
    4 tsp       cornstarch
          Freshly ground black pepper, to taste
          Freshly grated nutmeg, to taste
    1 1/4 cups (310 ml)       Riesling (or other dry white wine)
    4 tsp (20 ml)       Kirsch (optional)

    Emmental again! But mercifully not too much. And Vacherin, certainly not a bad idea. And for my taste a little too much wine, but the traditions vary.

  5. This one (for six people) looks good at first sight:

    400 g       de gruyère suisse
    200 g       d'appenzeller
    200 g       de vacherin Fribourgeois (à ne pas confondre avec le Vacherin Mont-d'Or)
    200 g       de tilsit
    30 cl       de vin blanc sec
    1 cuillère à café       de maïzena
    5 cl       de kirsch

    No garlic. No lemon juice. And four different cheeses! Three of them are classics (and this is the first mention of Appenzeller cheese), but Tilsit cheese? If there's one thing I've learnt about fondue in the last 45 years, it's that only cheeses from Switzerland and the Jura are suitable. I wouldn't risk 1 kg of cheese on the Tilsit being an improvement. Also, this recipe has the lowest ratio of wine to cheese yet, only 300 ml of wine for 1 kg of cheese.

So it should be clear how little I expected the recipe from the caquelon to match our own. But we have, for four portions, slightly adjusted for normal portions and cheese type, and guessing some of the quantities, like “clove of garlic“:

Ingredient       Groggy       Stöckli       Recipe 1       Recipe 2       Recipe 3       Recipe 4       Recipe 5
Garlic       15 g       15 g       5 g       5 g       5 g       7 g      
Cornflour       20g       20 g       225 g       15 g       20 g       15 g       10 g
Gruyère       600 g       600 g             800 g       200 g       400 g       400 g
Appenzell       200 g       200 g                               200 g
Vacherin                                     100 g       200 g
Ememntal                   225 g             200 g       100 g
Tilsit                                           200 g
Cheddar                              
Wine       370 ml       350 ml       290 ml       375 g       238 ml       310 ml       300 ml
Lemon juice       20 ml       20 ml       5 ml                        
Kirsch       60 ml       50 ml       15 ml       80 ml             20 ml       50 ml
Ratio cheese/wine       2.16       2.3       1.55       2.13       1.68       2.58       3.33

Clearly there's room for differences in the recipes, and also for individual taste. My own recipe has changed from a ratio of 4:1 Gruyère to Appenzeller to a ratio of 3:1. On the whole, recipe 2 doesn't look too bad, though you need a very good single cheese. And Vacherin is an excellent fondue cheese, but we can't get it here (though I suggested it to Kevin Teather of the last month). And many recipes suggest pepper and nutmeg, though I find that they only help if the cheese is second-rate. And the difference in wine:cheese ratios (2:1!) is amazing.


Thursday, 15 November 2018 Dereel → Ballarat → Dereel Images for 15 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Sovereign Hill again
Topic: general, photography, opinion Link here

Off to Ballarat today to meet CJ Ellis, dressed up in his costume, and visit Sovereign Hill again. Things didn't start off well. When we got there, I discovered that I had no footwear. Never mind, this has happened before; that's why I keep a spare pair of thongs in the back of the car. Dug for them: not there! And while doing so, I managed to turf my camera out of the car and on to the parking lot. Two dropped (same) cameras in less than a week! And this time there was no panorama head to protect it, and it sustained damage:

 
This should be Camera-damage-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Camera damage 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 612 x 441, 113 kB
Dimensions of original: 2875 x 2071, 943 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 16 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Camera-damage-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Camera damage 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 449, 112 kB
Dimensions of original: 4615 x 3456, 2330 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 16 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The lens was (mercifully) again untouched, the camera still works, and the marks look pretty superficial. The camera still works, but I should really stop dropping the thing.

In to buy tickets, while Yvonne went off looking for footwear for me. It was definitely necessary. There are some places where I can walk barefoot with few problems, but Sovereign Hill is not one of them. By the time Yvonne got back, we hadn't got very far, but I really couldn't continue much further.

 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-50.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 50
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 443 x 611, 174 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5360, 5001 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-50-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 50 detail
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 534 x 505, 157 kB
Dimensions of original: 2062 x 1951, 885 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Met Yvonne at the entrance. By the time we got back, CJ was panning for gold for Ruth:

 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-31.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 31
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 179 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 5501 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-32.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 32
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 145 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 4978 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-35.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 35
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 163 kB
Dimensions of original: 5185 x 3888, 4651 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

On up the hill. It's been nearly 10 years since we were last here, and things have changed—for the better. They now have a school, full of schoolchildren. And with CJ dressed the way he was, he was welcomed, and he told a story about wanting a school for his nieces who would shortly arrive by ship from the Old Country:

 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-36.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 36
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 610 x 442, 194 kB
Dimensions of original: 5365 x 3888, 6038 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-39.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 39
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 170 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3889, 3979 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-41.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 41
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 165 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 4443 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-43.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 43
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 144 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 3453 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

On to see CJ's favourites, the old steam machinery:

 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-60.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 60
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 606 x 446, 170 kB
Dimensions of original: 4108 x 3024, 3311 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-79.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 79
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 612 x 441, 195 kB
Dimensions of original: 5394 x 3888, 5220 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

By then it was lunch time, and CJ disappeared by himself while we looked round the main street:

 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-54.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 54
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 181 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5185, 6681 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

CJ had wanted to take us to see the wheel wrights after lunch, but the girls decided differently and went to see the gold pouring instead, in light that was barely visible. I missed having the right lens with me, and was limited to the Panasonic Lumix G 20 mm f/1.7 from my E-PM1:

 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-121.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 121
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 605 x 446, 217 kB
Dimensions of original: 5277 x 3888, 8047 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

It would have been a good use for the barely used M.Zuiko 45 mm f/1.8 or the M.Zuiko 75 mm f/1.8. Next time.

Then down Red Hill Mine and got rather more photos than last time:

 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-182.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 182
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 446 x 606, 137 kB
Dimensions of original: 3024 x 4108, 13608 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-183.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 183
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 446 x 606, 129 kB
Dimensions of original: 3024 x 4108, 11499 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-184.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 184
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 446 x 606, 156 kB
Dimensions of original: 3024 x 4108, 11049 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-195.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 195
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 606 x 446, 154 kB
Dimensions of original: 4108 x 3024, 13267 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-195-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 195 detail
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 517 x 521, 148 kB
Dimensions of original: 1267 x 1278, 724 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The last image was taken with the E-PM1 at 36°/3200 ISO, clearly more than it can really sustain.

Finally a trooper came along to check the mining licenses. It was a bit tame compared with last time, where Carola was clapped in irons:

 
This should be sovereign-hill-28.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: sovereign hill 28
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 195 kB
Dimensions of original: 3648 x 2737, 3050 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 9 February 2009:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

About the only excitement was when one of the volunteers, a somewhat overweight woman, slipped in front of the trooper round about here:

 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-211.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 211
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 180 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5185, 4929 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

She confirmed that it wasn't part of the act, and I had to help her up. The trooper then sent her off to have herself looked at, before talking to the others and setting off in pursuit of an errant miner:

 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-215.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 215
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 607 x 444, 183 kB
Dimensions of original: 5311 x 3888, 5877 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-222-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 222 detail
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 433 x 624, 137 kB
Dimensions of original: 1978 x 2851, 1033 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

We finally found him in the main street, having grabbed somebody, though it's not clear that they were miners:

 
This should be Sovereign-Hill-225.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Sovereign Hill 225
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 604 x 447, 166 kB
Dimensions of original: 5254 x 3888, 4878 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Thursday, 15 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

And then we had had enough for the day. We're not as young as we used to be. If it weren't for the high entry fees, it would be nice to spread it over several days. Still, Ruth was very pleasantly surprised; I think she had initially not been very enthusiastic

As we were leaving, CJ asked me how old I was. In principle he knows: 10 years younger than he. But it seems that I'm entitled to a “Pioneer Pass”, a service so secret that I couldn't find any useful reference to it on the web site. It's available to people of the age of 70 or over who live in or near Ballarat (post code areas 3350 to 3358; we're in 3352). And it entitles the bearer to unlimited free entrance to Sovereign Hill and the Gold Museum. Filled out the form and was issued immediate access. Now if only he had told me that before we entered!

The good news is, of course, that I can go back and take specific photos whenever I want. That could be quite worthwhile.


Friday, 16 November 2018 Dereel Images for 16 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Garden flowers in late spring
Topic: gardening Link here

Middle of November; spring is going by quickly, and it's time for the “flowers in late spring” series.

There's nothing much to see this month. The dead trees are dead, and the others aren't doing that much better, though there are signs that the Paulownia kawakamii might be growing a little faster. Other plants have reacted more obviously to the relatively generous load of fertilizer that I gave them, notably the roses:

 
This should be Roses-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Roses 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 606 x 446, 219 kB
Dimensions of original: 5286 x 3888, 8283 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Sunday, 18 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That's all the more interesting because the Tropaeolum in the middle are not flowering particularly strongly, in contrast with the ones in front of the water tank:

 
This should be Tropaeolum.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Tropaeolum
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 280 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 8301 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 16 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

A couple of plants are flowering or coming up to flowering, I think for the first time: the Adenanthos sericeus (“woolly bush”, the small but brilliant Carpobrotus species that flowers all too shortly, and one of many Hebes that seem to be benefiting from the fertilizer:

 
This should be Adenanthos-sericeus.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Adenanthos sericeus
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 275 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 6492 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 16 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Carpobrotus-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Carpobrotus 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 310 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3889, 8163 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 16 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Hebe-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Hebe 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 308 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3890, 9368 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 16 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

And this, I think, is a Artemesia species. But which?

 
This should be Wormwood-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Wormwood 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 250 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 10400 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 16 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Wormwood-3.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Wormwood 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 172 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 3401 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 16 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry


Bird harassment
Topic: animals Link here

Ruth discovered something interesting this evening:

 
This should be Magpies-and-ducks-6-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Magpies and ducks 6 detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 651 x 415, 207 kB
Dimensions of original: 1971 x 1256, 1027 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 16 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Magpies-and-ducks-8-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Magpies and ducks 8 detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 658 x 411, 202 kB
Dimensions of original: 2258 x 1409, 1211 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 16 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

This should be Magpies-and-ducks-9-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Magpies and ducks 9 detail          Dimensions:          822 x 328, 181 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Friday, 16 November 2018, thumbnails          All images taken on Friday, 16 November 2018, small
Diary entry for Friday, 16 November 2018 Complete exposure details

   
This should be Magpies-and-ducks-10-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Magpies and ducks 10 detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 715 x 378, 186 kB
Dimensions of original: 1996 x 1055, 766 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Friday, 16 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

This should be Magpies-and-ducks-11-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Magpies and ducks 11 detail          Dimensions:          815 x 331, 146 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Friday, 16 November 2018, thumbnails          All images taken on Friday, 16 November 2018, small
Diary entry for Friday, 16 November 2018 Complete exposure details

 

A (small) family of Australian wood ducks walking across the paddock, not far from where our pond used to be 4 years ago. I wonder if they were looking for it.

But more importantly, a couple of magpies took exception to their presence. I've seen them chase other animals before, notably foxes, but this is the first time I've seen them chase ducks.


Saturday, 17 November 2018 Dereel → Maits Rest → 12 Apostles → Port Campbell → Dereel Images for 17 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

Great Ocean Road again
Topic: general, gardening, opinion Link here

Off relatively early this morning with Nikolai and Leonid to visit the Great Ocean Road again. To my surprise, it's only the third time that Yvonne and I have been there together, and the last time was nearly 10 years ago. And in that time the public has not only changed completely, but become much more.

On the way stopped to show Ruth a Callistemon (bottlebrush):

 
This should be Ruth-Yvonne-bottlebrushes.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Ruth Yvonne bottlebrushes
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 246 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5186, 7513 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Bottlebrush-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Bottlebrush 2
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 204 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 3849 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Further on found a number of purple-flowering bushes:

 
This should be Wildflowers-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Wildflowers 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 267 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 11945 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Wildflowers-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Wildflowers 2
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 284 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 6329 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Wildflowers-3.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Wildflowers 3
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 187 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 4147 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Yvonne was rather taken with them, and we broke off a short twig and took it home. To my surprise, it survived, and Yvonne wants to try to propagate it.

First to Mait's Rest, where things were not in as good a state as last time we were there. In particular, I had wanted to take a repeat of this photo:

 
This should be yvonne-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: yvonne 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 448 x 602, 205 kB
Dimensions of original: 2736 x 3679, 2134 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Wednesday, 10 October 2007:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

The tree (fern) was still there, and possibly a bit bigger, but the whole area was cordoned off because the platform was unsafe.

From there down towards Cape Otway to look for the Koalas that used to be there in great numbers. We found a couple, but nothing like as many as five years ago, and I didn't get much in the way of photos:

 
This should be Koala-18.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Koala 18
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 171 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 2960 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Koala-13.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Koala 13
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 165 kB
Dimensions of original: 4608 x 3456, 2274 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Thence to the Twelve Apostles. Weather was good, but we've seen it before. More panorama attempts, the best of which is this one:


This should be Apostles-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Apostles 1          Dimensions:          924 x 292, 133 kB Display location on map
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Saturday, 17 November 2018, thumbnails          All images taken on Saturday, 17 November 2018, small
Diary entry for Saturday, 17 November 2018 Complete exposure details

 

Yvonne was on a Borzoi sales trip, finding many interested people:

 
This should be Borzois-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Borzois 1
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 129 kB
Dimensions of original: 5179 x 3884, 3472 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Borzois-3.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Borzois 3
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 130 kB
Dimensions of original: 5176 x 3883, 3603 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

It seems that dogs aren't allowed there. They go to great lengths to make that clear:

 
This should be Apostles-21.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Apostles 21
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 142 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 4595 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Apostles-22.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Apostles 22
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 224 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 7665 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Where's the “no dogs” sign? It's in the first image:

 
This should be Apostles-21-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Apostles 21 detail
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 387 x 696, 136 kB
Dimensions of original: 487 x 876, 158 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

We missed that one and didn't see anything until we were nearly at the end of the way. Far too late to take the dogs back...

Then on to Port Campbell, where the dogs saw seawater for the first time:

 
This should be Port-Campbell-3.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Port Campbell 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 155 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 4039 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Port-Campbell-7.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Port Campbell 7
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 146 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 3593 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

I get the impression that they're not very interested:

 
This should be Port-Campbell-21.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Port Campbell 21
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 141 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 3930 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Definitely a difference from Nemo.

We had the option of continuing to Warrnambool, but the ladies had had enough, so back home after that.


GPS pain, alleviated
Topic: technology, opinion Link here

Last year we had a pretty average catastrophe trying to get to Halls Gap with the “aid” of a GPS navigator. Today wasn't as bad: firstly, we knew the way pretty well (though finding Mait's Rest wasn't that obvious), and secondly I had researched the route online with Google Maps and then sent the route to my phone, even being careful enough to test to ensure that it got there.

So when we set off, it was a little surprising to discover that the route wasn't there. I had tested it the first time, but not the second one. So I had to used the first one, which only took me to the Koala place on Cape Otway. And when we got to Colac, my car navigator and my phone disagreed. Ruth fired up hers too so that we could at least get a majority. But my phone came up with all sorts of nonsense, like telling me to turn right where there was absolutely no turnoff, and mentioning road names that didn't exist. My best guess was that it lost signal and was too polite to tell me so. But there's nothing obvious from the track that suggests that:

 
This should be track.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: track
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 492 x 548, 552 kB
Dimensions of original: 945 x 1052, 1747 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

On top of that, the damned thing kept beeping at frequent but irregular intervals. If it gave any indication on the display, it was too fast for Yvonne. Why do phones do that? They go to immense lengths to do voice recognition, sometimes successfully. Why can't they do the much simpler task of voice generation to say what they want?


Sunday, 18 November 2018 Dereel Images for 18 November 2018
Top of page
previous day
next day
last day

The fun of photography
Topic: photography, technology, food and drink, opinion Link here

Spent most of today writing up and processing photos for the past two days, and I still didn't get finished. Once again I ran into issues with panoramas including the sea:


This should be Port-Campbell-27.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Port Campbell 27          Dimensions:          1167 x 231, 111 kB Display location on map
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Saturday, 17 November 2018, thumbnails          All images taken on Saturday, 17 November 2018, small
Diary entry for Saturday, 17 November 2018 Complete exposure details

 

Maybe I should have taken a fisheye lens with me to get a single photo of the sea to blend into the panorama.

And in the evening Ruth did some cooking. OK, take a photo for souvenir's sake. It's so simple now that we have the flash units in place.

Well, no:

  1. The first time round the flash didn't fire. Dammit, these contacts are really an issue.

  2. The second time round the flash didn't fire. Further checking showed that this was the flash trigger with the on/off switch. Maybe I should leave it on.

  3. The third time round the flash didn't fire. Dammit, these contacts are really an issue.

  4. The fourth time round the flash finally fired. And it was overexposed! I had the thing set to auto-ISO, so modulo noise (39°/6400 ISO), in fact the first three images were almost OK:

     
    This should be Ruth-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
    Image title: Ruth 1
    Complete exposure details
    Dimensions: 450 x 600, 147 kB
    Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5186, 4842 kB
    Display this image:
    thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
    Display all images on this page as:
    thumbnails    this size
    Show for Sunday, 18 November 2018:
    thumbnails    small images    diary entry

    Only the flash one was hopelessly overexposed.

  5. And then the display on the back of the camera went dead! Instead I got everything only through the viewfinder. Delayed damage from dropping the camera? Took off the viewfinder cup and it worked. Somehow I must have managed to mis-position it in a way that caused the automatic viewfinder switch to trigger. After repositioning it, the camera worked normally.

  6. And later in the evening I decided to take some photos without the kitchen flash—and without checking the exposure. Bad idea:

     
    This should be After-dinner-7.jpeg.  Is it missing?
    Image title: After dinner 7
    Complete exposure details
    Dimensions: 600 x 450, 153 kB
    Dimensions of original: 5185 x 3888, 4891 kB
    Display this image:
    thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
    Display all images on this page as:
    thumbnails    this size
    Show for Sunday, 18 November 2018:
    thumbnails    small images    diary entry
  7. That doesn't look that bad, but it's clearly dark despite multiple attempts to recover it.


Monday, 19 November 2018 Dereel Images for 19 November 2018
Top of page
previous day

Ubuntu for CJ
Topic: technology, opinion Link here

CJ Ellis' computer is so infected with viruses (I think) that the best thing appears to be to reinstall the OS. But on discussing it on IRC, people suggested that I should avoid Microsoft and install Ubuntu instead.

I resisted. Why? I really have very little love for Microsoft, but if I install Ubuntu, I alone will be responsible for support. But on thinking about it, the idea didn't sound that bad. I seem to end up doing it anyway, and certainly there will be less infections with Ubuntu. So I downloaded the 18.04 LTS version and installed.

Installation was much as I feared. It started off by identifying the existing FreeBSD installation:


This should be Ubuntu-1-detail.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Ubuntu 1 detail          Dimensions:          1519 x 178, 109 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Monday, 19 November 2018, thumbnails          All images taken on Monday, 19 November 2018, small
Diary entry for Monday, 19 November 2018 Complete exposure details

 

For some reason (probably the keyboard) I managed to enter the password incorrectly several times, culminating (as I discovered) in entering the same incorrect password twice, meaning that I couldn't log in after rebooting.

How do you recover from this in Ubuntu? In FreeBSD you would boot single-user and reset. But how do you boot single user in Ubuntu? It's even too polite to show me the boot messages. Again, IRC to the rescue:

<ozz> During beginning of boot press the any key
<ozz> You should see a language select menu.
<groggyhimself> Nope.
<groggyhimself> Came back to the login prompt.
<oggle> groggyhimself: hold shift when booting?
<groggyhimself> Ah, *that*'s the ANY key?

Tried both, and they didn't work. Looking online told me that the SHIFT key was correct, but that it “didn't always work”.

I've noticed on some systems that timing when to hit the left Shift key can be tricky, sometimes I miss it and need to try it again.

Dammit, boot from DVD and see if that helped, noting once again how glacially slow the boot process is. This page was of some help, though in principle it was pretty obvious:

The only thing that wasn't obvious was the chroot.

After that, setting up the system. How I HATE these colours that they insist on producing. Apart from the fact that they're far too gaudy, all assume a terminal with bright (white?) text on a black background. Make it sane and you get something like this:


This should be Ubuntu-4.png.  Is it missing?
Image title: Ubuntu 4          Dimensions:          967 x 279, 197 kB
Make a single page with this image Hide this image
Make this image a thumbnail Make thumbnails of all images on this page
Display small version of all images on this page
All images taken on Monday, 19 November 2018, thumbnails          All images taken on Monday, 19 November 2018, small
Diary entry for Monday, 19 November 2018 Complete exposure details

 

My background isn't completely white, which makes it (barely) possible to see the white text.

I've noted how to do this before, by fixing a file called /etc/DIR_COLORS. But that's an old, worn-out magic word. More searching online gave me that ls and grep are aliases deliberately intended to annoy with these colours. Unalias and they behave normally. But apt isn't like that, and I haven't found a way to get around it. I tried resetting the TERM environment variable to something monochrome, but that didn't interest it. WHAT a pain!

Apart from that, yet another GUI to get used to. As they proudly announce:

 
This should be Ubuntu-3.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Ubuntu 3
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 608 x 444, 67 kB
Dimensions of original: 4266 x 3112, 3709 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 19 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Ubuntu 18.04 works differently from older versions

They don't say why they have changed things.

Still, after some pain I got things installed. I hope that CJ can come to terms with it.


First outdoor Hibiscus
Topic: gardening Link here

The Hibiscus rosa-sinensis that I planted last week is recovering, and today the first flower bloomed:

 
This should be Hibiscus-1.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Hibiscus 1
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 450 x 600, 223 kB
Dimensions of original: 3888 x 5184, 7820 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 19 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Hibiscus-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Hibiscus 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 146 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 4077 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 19 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Nothing spectacular, but that's a plant that I've been tending for over 10 years, and this is the first cutting that I have planted outside, so it seemed to be something of an achievement.

Also got round to taking more photos of the flowers that Ruth picked on Saturday. They have certainly lasted well, considering that they were stuck in the ventilator grille of the car all day before being put in water. Here hopefully enough to identify them:

 
This should be Wildflowers-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Wildflowers 2
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 284 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 6329 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Wildflowers-3.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Wildflowers 3
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 187 kB
Dimensions of original: 5186 x 3888, 4147 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Wildflower-2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Wildflower 2
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 100 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 3165 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 19 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry


More HDR comparisons
Topic: photography, opinion Link here

I had intended to do more work on Saturday's photos today, but somehow I didn't get round to it. But it's interesting to compare two individual photos that I took:

 
This should be Apostles-5.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Apostles 5
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 128 kB
Dimensions of original: 5177 x 3882, 3697 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry
 
This should be Apostles-5-HDR2.jpeg.  Is it missing?
Image title: Apostles 5 HDR2
Display location on map
Complete exposure details
Dimensions: 600 x 450, 166 kB
Dimensions of original: 5184 x 3888, 4331 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Saturday, 17 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

Which looks better? The first is merged from a group of 3 photos taken hand-held at 3 EV intervals, and the second is an in-camera “HDR2” image. Sorry, I still can't find any use for in-camera HDR.


Do you exist?
Topic: general, opinion Link here

Another letter for Yvonne today from Carsat, the French social security department, asking for an “attestation d'existence”, close enough to English to be obvious.

 
This should be ade.gif.  Is it missing?
Image title: ade
Display location on map
Dimensions: 734 x 368, 147 kB
Dimensions of original: 2694 x 1349, 1177 kB
Display this image:
thumbnail    hidden   alone on page
Display all images on this page as:
thumbnails    this size
Show for Monday, 19 November 2018:
thumbnails    small images    diary entry

That makes sense: people die, and somehow they have to know when they can stop paying. But look at the date! 25 October, nearly a month ago! And they want an answer by 11 December, or they will stop pension payments. If it's that urgent, they could at least have sent it by airmail, rather then storing it in Belgium for a few weeks.


Top of page Previous month Greg's home page Today's diary entry Greg's photos Copyright information

Valid XHTML 1.0!

$Id: diary-nov2018.php,v 1.16 2018/11/20 02:39:58 grog Exp $